In the same vein, Cooper 2019 proposes the author’s personal view of this story, focusing on his own theoretical achievements. Gawronski and Strack 2012 offers an overview of the cognitive consistency field. More aimed at advanced researchers in cognitive dissonance, Harmon-Jones 2019 (the second edition of Harmon-Jones and Mills 1999) is an edited volume that synthesizes modern perspectives on dissonance. There are a variety of ways people are thought to cognitive dissonance and addiction resolve the sense of dissonance when cognitions don’t seem to fit together. They may include denying or compartmentalizing unwelcome thoughts, seeking to explain away a thought that doesn’t comport with others, or changing what one believes or one’s behavior. While cognitive dissonance is often described as something widely and regularly experienced, efforts to capture it in studies don’t always work, so it could be less common than has been assumed.
As such, no set of external signs can reliably indicate a person is experiencing cognitive dissonance. They further presupposed that participants would be driven to reduce the dissonance by justifying their behavior. Since participants in the $20 condition had a more substantial justification (higher pay) already, they were further assumed to perceive less dissonance than those in the $1 condition. Confronting cognitive dissonance can often lead to positive results. Sometimes, resolving cognitive dissonance is just a matter of changing your perspective on something or developing new patterns of thinking to help you live according to what’s most important to you.
How does cognitive dissonance affect the workplace?
In other words, it appears that participants reduced the dissonance they felt by deciding that they hadn’t lied when they said the study was enjoyable and that they really had liked the study. Festinger and Carlsmith wanted to create a feeling of dissonance in participants—in this case, their belief (that lying should be avoided) is at odds with their action (they just lied to someone). The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people are averse to inconsistencies within their own minds. It offers one explanation for why people sometimes make an effort to adjust their thinking when their own thoughts, words, or behaviors seem to clash with each other.
- Noulas claims that successes in women’s rights, reducing child marriages, and ending slavery are examples that result from cognitive dissonance.
- This is often very difficult, as people frequently employ a variety of mental maneuvers.
- Psychologist Joel Cooper recently published a comprehensive update of cognitive dissonance theory after more than 50 years of research.
- For all open access content, the Creative Commons licensing terms apply.
- In others words, people sometimes cope with feelings of dissonance by surrounding themselves in “echo chambers” where their opinions are supported and validated by others.
- You’ll replace them and always pick up after your dog in the future.
When we see a close friend stealing something and we strongly believe that stealing is unethical, we hesitate to rat them out because we fear that we may lose the friendship. This causes cognitive dissonance between being faithful to our buddy and doing what we think is right. We know that smoking is bad for our https://ecosoberhouse.com/ health and understand all the adverse effects of tobacco on our body and people around us. We may attempt to quit smoking for a while, but the urge of smoking increases as we become dependent on nicotine and end up smoking anyway. This knowledge also helps your team navigate these challenges more effectively.
Who proposed the cognitive dissonance theory?
In the dieting example, you justify that doughnut by telling yourself you didn’t actually intend to be that strict about the diet or that the diet is only part of your weight loss plan. Cognitive dissonance can also occur when consumers are exposed to negative information about a brand they are loyal to. Businesses should proactively address this dissonance by providing exceptional post-purchase support, such as clear return policies or responsive customer service, to mitigate potential buyer’s remorse. Viktoriya Sus is an academic writer specializing mainly in economics and business from Ukraine. She holds a Master’s degree in International Business from Lviv National University and has more than 6 years of experience writing for different clients. Viktoriya is passionate about researching the latest trends in economics and business.
